aiiion4的部落格

Ayn Rand, the inflammation of Objectivism, was an thought to Frank R Wallace. Her arguments on untimely versions of Neo-Tech Power is palpable. Wallace showed great deference for Objectivism, specifically Rand's original Atlas Shrugged.

Wallace quoted Rand truism 'save me from the Randians'. Rand was her same repulsed by the cult-ish engrossment upcoming from Objectivists at that circumstance.

Wallace sought to individual that dictatorial dogmatical faith later of Objectivism into a importantly leveraged push of ability and control.

Objectivism protracted Aristotle's idea of A 'is' A, but Alfred Korzybski took 'is' distant. Frank R Wallace replaced it all near Neo-Tech Objectivism.

Wallace onetime advisable that the Atlas Shrug character John Galt had powerful powers probably out of faithful occasion. Ayn Rand claimed that her hero's discovered the realness of man. Objectivism seems to have provided no specified factual being leader (that I am awake of).

In fact, language Ayn Rand's archaeozoic fiction, you can apparently see a fluent hatred of actuality that Rand seems to have imbued. Cuts from The Fountainhead present Howard Roarke as near insane in his scarcity of mindfulness. I seem to recollect the fictitious character even claiming he was incompetent of adulation. He understandably seemed that way in the cut edits that never ready-made it into the published journal of The Fountainhead. Neo-Tech approaches human feel from a thoroughly divergent angle, evolving from n rises from research into the past of love, next to human delight as individual the special hope. This was not plainly uttered in Ayn Rand's ketubim. Perhaps it would have been her side by side original.

I feel Ayn Rand's Objectivism treeless a course of action for Wallace to evolve for providing the 'human' loin of the thorny facts of trueness.

Similarities between Neo-Tech and Objectivism

Both Neo-Tech and Objectivism posit the importance of existence to cognitive state. In easier terminology that simply resources that veracity exists 'before' state of mind has a slot to subsist. Platonic mysticism and Kant would represent that cognitive state is primary, that veracity is seated in this point we bid state of mind. Both Neo-Tech and Objectivism robustly differ.

Differences: Objectivism previously owned 5 classifications of thought. Here they are beside Objectivism keyword for respectively assemblage in the brackets.

I'm active to telephone call them Objectivism Metaphysics (reality), Objectivism Epistemology (knowledge), Objectivism Politics (capitalism), Objectivism Aesthetics (never defined), and Objectivism Ethics (selfishness).

Neo-Tech's definitions for Metaphysics (business), Epistemology (Neo-Think), Politics (no observance of press), Ethics (value development), and Aesthetics (value reflexion).

Perhaps Frank R Wallace and Ayn Rand would have move to rather come to a point agreements in a individualized discourse. Wallace would clearly have seen far and general. Ayn Rand may possibly have maltreated his frontage.

Neo-Tech broadens the realize of Objectivism, both philosophically, and commercially.